Subject of Dispute: Recognition of Ownership Rights to an Apartment Located at 122 Fontanska Road.
Main Court Arguments:
1. The court established that the plaintiff was properly notified about court hearings but did not appear.
2. The Supreme Court deviated from previous practice and noted that the plaintiff’s non-appearance cannot automatically lead to dismissal of the claim.
3. The court took into account that the plaintiff filed motions, objections, and demonstrated an active procedural position, which indicates his interest in the case.
Court Decision: Reject the cassation appeal, upholding the appellate court’s ruling to send the case for a new review.
