Subject of Dispute: Criminal Proceedings against PERSON_6, a driver who caused a traffic accident resulting in serious bodily injuries to the victim.
Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court did not agree with the appellate court’s decision to declare evidence of the driver’s state of alcohol intoxication inadmissible. The court indicated that the procedure for obtaining biological samples complied with regulatory requirements, no individual rights were violated, and the expert conclusion showing 2.7 per mille of ethyl alcohol in the blood should be accepted as admissible evidence.
Court Decision: Revoke the ruling of the Vinnytsia Appellate Court and assign a new review in the appellate court.
