Here is the translation:
1. Subject of Dispute: Recovery from JSC “Khmelnytskoblenergo” in favor of LLC “Land Management Company “Privat” of payment under the service agreement in the amount of 7,147,231.86 UAH.
2. Main Court Arguments:
– The agreement is a service agreement, not a contract of work
– Expiration of the agreement term does not terminate the parties’ obligations
– Impossibility of performing the agreement after its term expiration is not grounds for recovering the full cost of services
– The executor had the right to refuse performance of the agreement, but this does not mean the impossibility of its performance
3. Court Decision: Leave the court decisions of previous instances unchanged, modifying only the reasoning part of the resolution.
: The court deviated from the previous practice of qualifying the agreement as a work contract, defining it as a service agreement.
