Here is the translation:
Subject of Dispute: The prosecutor challenged the decision of the Kharkiv City Council regarding the privatization of non-residential premises and their purchase and sale agreements.
Key Arguments of the Court:
1. Declaring the city council’s decision invalid, which has already been executed, is not an effective method of protecting the territorial community’s rights.
2. The court deviated from previous practice and noted that challenging already executed administrative decisions will not restore rights.
3. The only appropriate method of protection is a vindicatory claim for property recovery, rather than declaring contracts invalid.
Court Decision: Reject the prosecutor’s claim due to the selection of an inappropriate method of rights protection, as well as due to incorrect identification of the defendant.
