Subject of the dispute: Recovery of debt under a credit agreement from an individual by a bank.
Main arguments of the court: The Supreme Court considers that the appellate court prematurely refused to open appellate proceedings, since the lawyer’s powers were confirmed by a legal assistance agreement and a certificate of the right to practice law. The court also noted that the party to the case (the defendant) has the right to personally eliminate the deficiencies of the appellate complaint, regardless of the fact that the complaint was filed by their representative.
Court decision: The cassation complaint was satisfied, the appellate court’s ruling was revoked, and the case was referred back to the appellate court for further consideration.
