Subject of Dispute: Appointment of a Pension for Length of Service to a Person Dismissed from Service in the State Criminal Executive Service.
Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court established that the preferential calculation of length of service for employees of the criminal executive service allows for faster acquisition of the necessary years for pension appointment. The Court emphasized that preferential accounting does not change the actual length of service, but only accelerates its calculation. Moreover, the court pointed out that the right to preferential accounting of length of service for pension appointment is provided by law and does not depend on the edition of subordinate normative acts.
Court Decision: The Supreme Court satisfied the cassation appeal, canceled the decision of the appellate court, and ordered the appointment of a length of service pension to PERSON_1.
