Subject of Dispute: Modification of the Method and Amount of Alimony for the Maintenance of a Minor Son.
Main Arguments of the Court:
1. The court thoroughly analyzed the circumstances of the case and established that the defendant, who is a military serviceperson, did not provide irrefutable evidence of the impossibility to participate in the court proceedings.
2. The Supreme Court considers that when resolving the issue of suspending proceedings in alimony cases, the best interests of the child should be taken into account, rather than formally applying procedural norms.
3. The court drew attention to the fact that the defendant had the opportunity to use legal assistance, personally signed procedural documents, and was represented by a lawyer throughout the proceedings.
Court Decision: To cancel the ruling of the appellate court on suspending the proceedings in the case and to refer the case for further consideration.
