Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Case No. 466/8669/20 dated 26/02/2025

Subject of Dispute: Recognition of Apartment as Mortgaged and Foreclosure of Mortgage Subject under the Credit Agreement.

Main Court Arguments:

1. The mortgage on the apartment remains valid, even if there was a temporary absence of its record in the register.

2. The alienation of the apartment occurred without the bank’s consent, during the validity of a court decision recognizing the mortgage agreement as invalid, which was subsequently cancelled.

3. The court established the bad faith actions of the original owner, who attempted to evade credit obligations by transferring the apartment to another person.

Court Decision: Recognize the apartment as mortgaged and foreclose on the mortgage subject, but with suspension of the decision’s execution during the period of martial law.

Note: The court deviated from previous practice regarding interpretation of the mortgagee’s rights under conditions of temporary absence of mortgage record.

Full text by link

E-mail
Password
Confirm Password
Lexcovery
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.