Subject of Dispute: Official Forgery of Protocols on Administrative Offenses, Committed by Police Officers.
Main Arguments of the Court:
1. The Appellate Court improperly verified the evidence in the case, ignoring the instructions of the cassation court.
2. District court rulings on administrative offenses do not have prejudicial significance for the criminal case.
3. The Appellate Court unjustifiably deemed evidence collected during pre-trial investigation as inadmissible.
Court Decision: To cancel the ruling of the Lviv Appellate Court and assign a new review of the case in the appellate court, taking into account the provided instructions.
