Here is the translation:
1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging orders on disciplinary proceedings and dismissal of a civil servant for violation of the Oath.
2. Key Arguments of the Court:
– Dismissal for violation of the Oath is possible only with clear proof of misconduct against service interests
– The Disciplinary Commission did not provide specific facts of non-performance of official duties
– It is improper to hold a person liable for collective decisions
– The Court pointed out that cancellation of the disciplinary responsibility order is not an automatic basis for reinstatement
3. Court Decision: Cancel previous court decisions and refer the case for a new review to the court of first instance for a more detailed examination of dismissal circumstances.
