Here is the translation:
1. Subject of Dispute: Recalculation of pension for a person who was seconded from military service to the prosecutor’s office, based on a certificate of monetary compensation.
2. Main Arguments of the Court:
– Newly discovered circumstances are legal facts that existed during the initial case review but were not known to the process participants.
– A change in the court’s legal position in other cases is not a newly discovered circumstance.
– The appellate court incorrectly applied procedural law norms when it satisfied the application for review of the decision based on newly discovered circumstances.
3. Court Decision: Revoke the appellate court’s resolution and reject the application for review of the judicial decision based on newly discovered circumstances.
Important: – The court clearly stated that a change in legal position in other cases cannot be grounds for reviewing a judicial decision.
