Here is the translation of the legal analysis:
1. Subject of Dispute: Establishing the fact of living together without marriage registration and recognition of property ownership rights for a shared property.
2. Main Arguments of the Court:
The court established that the plaintiff was in a registered marriage until February 23, 2023, and therefore cannot claim to establish the fact of cohabitation with another man before terminating the previous marriage. The legislation prohibits simultaneous presence in multiple marriages, so recognition of such relations is impossible. The court also noted that recognition of the claim by the defendant does not automatically mean satisfaction of the claim – legal grounds are necessary.
3. Court Decision: The cassation appeal was left without satisfaction, and the appellate court’s ruling on denial of the claim remains unchanged.
