Subject of Dispute: Recovery of Debt under a Legal Assistance Agreement from the Heir of a Deceased Client.
Main Arguments of the Court:
1. The court established that the legal assistance agreement between the lawyer and the client was not actually concluded due to the absence of indisputable evidence of its signing and agreement on essential terms.
2. PERSON_3, on whose behalf the agreement was allegedly concluded, had mental disorders and could not comprehend the significance of his actions, which was confirmed by a post-mortem forensic psychiatric examination.
3. The absence of the original agreement and contradictions in the provided copies did not allow the court to establish the actual terms of the transaction.
Court Decision: Deny the recovery of debt and foreclosure on inherited property.
Note: The court deviated from previous practice of invalidating agreements, instead recognizing the agreement as not concluded.
