The case concerns challenging the inaction of the High Council of Justice regarding the non-consideration of the plaintiff’s complaint against judges.
The court was guided by the following key arguments: the statement of claim cannot be considered signed, as the signature is located before the text of the document, which contradicts the legal position of the Supreme Court on the need to place the signature at the end of the document to confirm the person’s expression of will. Moreover, there are no indisputable proofs that the signature was made by the plaintiff himself, and not by a representative.
The court decided to partially satisfy the appellate complaint, modifying the reasoning part of the previous ruling, but leaving the decision to return the statement of claim in force.
