Here is the translation:
1. Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of the purchase and sale agreement and return of a radiation protection shelter with an area of 90 sq. m to state ownership.
2. Main Arguments of the Court:
The court established that radiation protection shelter No. 67779 is a civil defense protective structure that could not be privatized. Registration cards and other evidence confirm that at the time of privatization, this premises had the status of a protective structure. Since protective structures are not subject to privatization, the claim is considered a negatory action – aimed at removing obstacles to the use of state property.
3. Court Decision: Uphold the decisions of previous instances on satisfying the prosecutor’s claim and returning the radiation protection shelter to state ownership.
A key feature of the decision is a clear determination of the impossibility of privatizing civil defense protective structures.