Here is the translation:
1. Subject of Dispute: Omega Terminal S.A. Company challenges the property lease agreement, claiming it was signed by an unauthorized person.
2. Key Court Arguments:
– Interim measures cannot be identical to resolving the dispute on its merits
– There is a presumption of the contract’s legitimacy
– Prohibiting contract performance effectively interferes with the defendant’s economic activity
– The plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence of the urgent need for interim measures
3. Court Decision: The Supreme Court cancelled the appellate court’s ruling on interim measures and upheld the first instance court’s decision to reject interim measures.
Key Thesis: The court emphasized that temporary measures cannot completely block the defendant’s economic activity without indisputable evidence.
