Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Case No. 904/3016/23 dated 18/02/2025

Subject of Dispute: Recovery of Debt under the Electricity Transmission Services Agreement and Accrual of Inflation Losses and 3% Per Annum.

Main Court Arguments:

The court established that the rules on exemption from liability due to force majeure do not extend to accessory monetary obligations, specifically the accrual of inflation losses and 3% per annum. Force majeure does not exempt from fulfilling the main monetary obligation, but only temporarily suspends liability for its non-performance. Despite the martial law, the defendant was obliged to continue making payments, and therefore, the accrual of inflation losses and interest is legitimate.

Court Decision: The Supreme Court partially satisfied the cassation appeal, canceled the decisions of previous instances regarding the refusal to recover 3% per annum and inflation losses, and referred the case for a new review.

Full text by link

E-mail
Password
Confirm Password
Lexcovery
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.