Here is the translation of the legal analysis:
1. Subject of Dispute: The Prosecutor’s Office attempted to secure a claim to declare invalid a service procurement contract between the Department of Improvement and LLC “Avtomahistral 2016” by prohibiting any actions under this contract.
2. Key Court Arguments: The Supreme Court deviated from previous practice and indicated that prohibiting contract performance violates the presumption of transaction legitimacy. The Court emphasized that such interim measures: 1) do not correspond to the principle of reasonableness; 2) violate the balance of parties’ interests; 3) essentially interfere with economic activity; 4) prematurely substitute a court decision.
3. Court Decision: The Supreme Court reversed the decisions of previous instances and completely denied the prosecutor’s request for interim measures.
