Here is the translation:
Subject of Dispute: Recognition of the Order as Invalid Regarding the Transfer of Land Plots to Communal Ownership, Partially Located within the Border Strip.
Key Arguments of the Court:
1. Land plots located within the border strip are automatically classified as defense lands, which can only be in state ownership.
2. The Supreme Court deviated from the previous position of the appellate court, which considered that the location of a land plot within the border strip does not make it defense land.
3. The absence of a separate land management project does not cancel the status of defense lands, as their dimensions are established by legislation.
Court Decision: To cancel the appellate court’s resolution and refer the case for a new hearing to conduct additional investigation of evidence regarding the overlapping of land plots with the border strip.
