Here is the translation:
1. Subject of Dispute: Official misconduct by Ukrzaliznytsia officials in establishing preferential tariffs for freight transportation.
2. Main Arguments of the Court:
– The fact of existence or absence of agreements between the official and the beneficiary has no criminal legal significance
– Criminal liability occurs if the official acted contrary to the interests of service, regardless of prior agreements
– The court identified inconsistencies in the formulation of charges by the appellate court
3. Court Decision: Revoke the verdict of the Appellate Chamber of the High Anti-Corruption Court and assign a new review in the appellate court.
Key Thesis: An official may be held liable for abuse even without direct agreements with the beneficiary.
