Subject of the Dispute: Establishing the Fact of Ownership of Legal Documents for Pension Recalculation.
Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court considers that the case should be considered under civil proceedings in separate proceedings, as it concerns establishing a fact that has legal significance for the person’s exercise of the right to a pension. The courts of previous instances erroneously believed that this was an administrative dispute, although in fact the applicant is requesting to establish the ownership of documents due to discrepancies in the surname.
Court Decision: The cassation appeal is satisfied, the court decisions of previous instances are canceled, and the case is referred for a new review to the court of first instance.
