Subject of Dispute: Recognition of the Pension Fund’s Decision as Unlawful Regarding Refusal to Grant a Pension for Length of Service to a Person Dismissed from the Criminal Enforcement Service.
Main Court Arguments: The Supreme Court established that for personnel of the criminal enforcement service, a special procedure for privileged length of service calculation is provided, which allows for faster accumulation of the necessary years for pension assignment. The Court emphasized that the privileged length of service calculation does not change the actual duration of service, but only accelerates its computation, and in this case, the plaintiff is entitled to a pension, as her privileged length of service exceeds 25 calendar years.
Court Decision: The Supreme Court satisfied the cassation appeal, canceled the appellate court’s resolution, and upheld the first instance court’s decision on granting a pension for length of service.
