Here is the translation:
Brief Analysis of the Court Decision:
1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging the orders of dismissing police officer PERSON_1 from service due to committing a disciplinary offense.
2. Main Court Arguments: The court deviated from previous practice, which previously provided a more lenient approach to service investigations.
– The disciplinary offense consisted of the plaintiff:
a) unjustifiably contacting a person during obtaining an illegal benefit
b) improperly controlling service weapon (lost magazine and ammunition)
c) undermining the police authority through his actions
– The absence of a criminal court verdict is not an obstacle for dismissal, as the plaintiff was dismissed for violating service discipline.
– The plaintiff’s actions discredit the police officer’s rank and are incompatible with further service.
3. Court Decision: Uphold the administrative appellate court’s resolution denying the claim and support the dismissal of PERSON_1 from police service.
