Subject of Dispute: Review of Sentence Regarding a Person Who Committed Several Thefts in Various Stores in the City of Brovary.
Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court established that due to changes in legislation (Law No. 3886-IX), several episodes of theft by PERSON_7 are no longer considered criminal offenses due to the low value of the stolen property. The court took into account that the value of the stolen property is less than two non-taxable minimum incomes of citizens, therefore these episodes fall under administrative, rather than criminal offense. At the same time, the court recognized as justified the previously imposed punishment of 5 years of imprisonment for other theft episodes.
Court Decision: The Supreme Court partially satisfied the cassation appeals, excluding three theft episodes from the sentence, but leaving the main punishment of 5 years of imprisonment unchanged.
