Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Case No. 226/1856/23 dated 18/02/2025

Subject of the Dispute: Prosecutor’s appeal against a court decision on releasing a person from serving a suspended sentence for evading conscription during mobilization.

Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court supported the decisions of previous instances, considering that the suspension of punishment is justified by several factors – the person works at critical infrastructure (coal enterprise), has no previous criminal record, has a minor child, the probation authority assessed the risks as moderate, and also taking into account the importance of economic support for the state during martial law.

Court Decision: To leave the previous court decisions unchanged and to reject the prosecutor’s cassation appeal.

Full text by link

E-mail
Password
Confirm Password
Lexcovery
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.