Subject of Dispute: Dispute regarding non-inclusion of certain monetary components in the monthly monetary allowance of a police officer upon dismissal.
Main Arguments of the Court:
1. The court drew attention that the respondent did not provide evidence of the plaintiff receiving a written notification about the accrued amounts upon dismissal, which is a mandatory condition under the legislation.
2. The court pointed to the need to take into account the previous court ruling of June 06, 2024, in case No. 160/24396/23, which may influence the determination of the term for appealing to the court.
3. The court considers the conclusions of previous instances about leaving the claim without consideration due to missed term to be premature.
Court Decision: To cancel the decisions of previous instances and refer the case for a new review to the court of first instance for a detailed examination of the circumstances.
