Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Ваш AI помічникНовий чат
    Open chat icon

    Case No. 140/7202/21 dated 13/02/2025

    Subject of Dispute: Recovery of Penalty for Late Reimbursement of Budget Debt on Value Added Tax.

    Main Arguments of the Court: The court took into account that at the time of filing the claim, there was a different judicial practice regarding the terms of court appeal, which allowed filing claims within 1,095 days. The Supreme Court recognized the change in judicial practice in 2023 as a valid reason for accepting the claim, despite the formal violation of the six-month term. The court emphasized that the change in judicial practice should not violate the principle of legal certainty and stability of legal regulation.

    Court Decision: To leave the decisions of previous instances unchanged, the cassation complaint of the Main Directorate of the State Tax Service in Volyn Oblast – without satisfaction.

    Full text by link

    E-mail
    Password
    Confirm Password
    Lexcovery
    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.