Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Case No. 140/1542/24 dated 18/02/2025

Subject of Dispute: A person challenges the Pension Fund’s refusal to grant them an old-age pension on general grounds with a new calculation of average salary.

Main Court Arguments: The Supreme Court for the first time changed its previous legal position and indicated that a person who is already receiving an old-age pension on preferential terms is not entitled to re-assignment of the same pension with a new calculation. The court emphasized that Article 13 of the Pension Provision Law provides not a separate type of pension, but preferential conditions with a lower retirement age, and such a pension is assigned according to the general rules of the Law on Compulsory Pension Insurance.

Court Decision: The Supreme Court upheld the decisions of previous instances and denied the plaintiff’s cassation appeal.

Full text by link

E-mail
Password
Confirm Password
Lexcovery
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.