Subject of Dispute: Challenging the Enforcement Officer’s Resolutions on Seizure of Funds from a Bank Account of a Person Who Is Not a Debtor in Enforcement Proceedings.
Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court established that the plaintiff is not a party to the enforcement proceedings, and therefore has the right to challenge the actions of the enforcement officer through administrative court proceedings. The courts of previous instances incorrectly closed the proceedings, referring to the need to consider the dispute in civil proceedings. The plaintiff claims that the seizure of her account occurred due to an error in specifying the debtor’s identification code, which requires verification through administrative procedures.
Court Decision: The Supreme Court revoked the decisions of the courts of previous instances and referred the case to the court of first instance for further consideration on the merits.
