The court was guided by the fact that the plaintiff was aware of the case consideration, as he had filed a motion to postpone the court hearing. At the same time, the absence of the date of drawing up the full text of the decision and the untimely entry of the decision into the Unified State Register of Court Decisions is not a ground for reinstating the term for appellate appeal if the case participant was aware of its consideration. The court also noted that a person who initiated the case themselves (the plaintiff) cannot be considered as not having been notified about the case consideration.
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.