1. INDIVIDUAL_1 challenged the decision of the High Council of Justice to deny his claims.
2. The plaintiff, INDIVIDUAL_1, requested the annulment of the decision of the High Council of Justice, while the defendant, the High Council of Justice, defended the legality of its decision.
3. The courts of previous instances denied INDIVIDUAL_1’s claim and upheld the decision of the High Council of Justice without changes.
4. The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court reviewed the appeal of INDIVIDUAL_1 and, after analyzing the case materials and the arguments of the parties, found no grounds for its satisfaction. The court established that the decision of the High Council of Justice was made in compliance with the requirements of the law and procedural norms. The plaintiff’s arguments regarding the violation of his rights were not confirmed during the case review. Thus, the court concluded that there were no grounds for annulling the contested decision.
5. The court ruled to leave INDIVIDUAL_1’s appeal unsatisfied and the decision of the previous instance court unchanged.
