[:uk]“`html

Summary of Recent EU Regulations and Decisions

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2672

This regulation updates the restrictive measures against individuals and entities involved in human rights violations in Nicaragua, amending the existing list of those subject to sanctions. It reflects the EU’s stance on human rights and democracy in Nicaragua, ensuring uniform enforcement of the measures across Member States.

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2663

This regulation modifies the sanctions framework against certain individuals and entities in Tunisia, specifically removing entries from the restrictive measures list. It reinforces the rights of defence and judicial protection for the individuals affected, ensuring compliance with EU human rights standards.

Council Regulation (EU) 2024/2642

This regulation establishes a framework for imposing restrictive measures against individuals and entities involved in destabilizing activities linked to Russia. It includes provisions for freezing assets, setting criteria for listing, and ensuring humanitarian exemptions while reinforcing the EU’s commitment to security and democracy.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2636

This regulation amends existing measures for managing the plant pest Clavibacter sepedonicus. It clarifies responsibilities for professional operators, mandates annual surveys, and updates reporting requirements to enhance pest control and surveillance effectiveness within the EU’s agricultural sector.

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2670

This regulation amends the list of individuals and entities subject to sanctions related to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), reflecting judicial rulings and ensuring compliance with international law while adapting to the evolving political landscape.

Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2658

This regulation establishes a fisheries closure for hake in specific Mediterranean geographical subareas, targeting Italian demersal longliners. It aims to protect the hake stock by prohibiting fishing activities once the maximum allowable effort has been reached.

Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2619

This regulation sets maximum residue levels (MRLs) for pesticide residues in food products, particularly for fosetyl, potassium phosphonates, and disodium phosphonate. It emphasizes food safety and consumer protection while accommodating agricultural practices that contribute to pesticide residues.

Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2632

This regulation enhances control measures against the plant pest Ralstonia solanacearum, expanding the scope to include potentially infected water sources and improving reporting protocols to bolster pest management across Member States.

Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2633

This regulation amends MRLs for several pesticides, aligning EU standards with international guidelines established by the Codex Alimentarius. It includes specific MRLs and emphasizes consumer safety through rigorous assessments of pesticide residues.

Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2612

This regulation updates MRLs for various pesticides, reflecting recent evaluations and ensuring compliance with EU food safety standards. It includes provisions for monitoring and regulatory compliance across Member States.

Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2609

This regulation addresses MRLs for napropamide, pyridaben, and tebufenpyrad in food and feed, reflecting updated safety assessments and ensuring consumer protection in the EU market.

Regulation (EU) 2024/2594

This regulation establishes a framework for the conservation and management of fisheries in the North-East Atlantic. It integrates recommendations from the North-East Atlantic Fisheries Commission and introduces binding measures for EU Member States to ensure sustainable fishing practices.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2621

This regulation specifies the classification of certain goods within the Combined Nomenclature, aiming for uniform application of customs duties and trade measures across the EU, particularly for complex products like tactical response robots.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2617

This regulation clarifies the classification of specific goods in the Combined Nomenclature, ensuring consistency in customs processing and compliance across Member States, particularly for advanced technological products.

Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2608

This regulation modifies the list of approved food additives, allowing powdered cellulose and glucono-delta-lactone to be used in unripened soft spreadable cheese products, thus enhancing production efficiency while ensuring food safety.

Decision No 1/2024 of the EU-Egypt Association Council

This decision amends Protocol 4 of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement, establishing new rules regarding the definition of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation, thereby enhancing trade relations between the EU and Egypt.

Agreement Between Norway and the EU on the Norwegian Financial Mechanism (2021-2028)

This agreement outlines Norway’s commitment to addressing economic disparities within the EEA through a financial mechanism, with a focus on sustainable development and social inclusion, while providing significant funding allocations to beneficiary states.

Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the EU and Norway

This protocol details special provisions for the importation of fish and fishery products from Norway, including annual duty-free tariff quotas and rules of origin, facilitating structured trade while ensuring compliance with EU regulations.

Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the EU and Iceland

This protocol establishes similar provisions for importing fish and fishery products from Iceland, ensuring continuity in trade relations and compliance with established quotas and rules of origin.

Agreement on the EEA Financial Mechanism (2021–2028)

This agreement outlines the framework for the EEA Financial Mechanism, focusing on reducing economic disparities and promoting cooperation among EFTA states and the EU, with specific financial commitments and thematic priorities for targeted investments.

“`

Review of each of legal acts published today:

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2672 of 8 October 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1716 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Nicaragua
“`html

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2672 Overview

The Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2672, adopted on 8 October 2024, amends the restrictive measures concerning the situation in Nicaragua as stipulated in Regulation (EU) 2019/1716. This regulation serves to update the list of individuals and entities subject to these measures based on a review conducted by the Council.

Key Provisions

Article 1

This article specifies that Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2019/1716 is amended as detailed in the accompanying annex of this regulation. It indicates the regulatory framework’s adaptability to changing circumstances, particularly concerning human rights violations in Nicaragua.

Article 2

This article states that the regulation will enter into force the day after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. It emphasizes the binding nature of the regulation, which is directly applicable in all EU Member States, ensuring uniform enforcement of the measures across the Union.

Amendments to Annex I

The amendments to Annex I detail updates to the listings of natural persons and legal entities subject to restrictive measures:

Natural Persons

1. Luís PÉREZ OLIVAS

• Date of Birth: 8 January 1956
• Gender: Male
• Position: Head of District Three Police Station in Managua since 2023
• Reasons for Listing: Involved in serious human rights violations, including torture and mistreatment of detainees.
• Date of Listing: 4 May 2020

2. Alba Luz RAMOS VANEGAS

• Date of Birth: 3 June 1949
• Gender: Female
• Nationality: Nicaraguan
• Passport Number: A0009864 (Nicaragua)
• Position: Former President of the Supreme Court of Justice of Nicaragua
• Reasons for Listing: Responsible for the instrumentalization of the judiciary to support the Ortega regime, violating due process and repressing opposition.
• Date of Listing: 2 August 2021

Legal Persons

1. Supreme Electoral Council (Consejo Supremo Electoral)

• Address: Pista Juan Pablo II, Managua 14005, Nicaragua
• Website: cse.gob.ni
• Email: [email protected]
• Reasons for Listing: The Council undermined democratic processes during the 2021 elections and repressed the opposition, including the cancellation of the legal status of the Yatama party in October 2023.
• Date of Listing: 10 January 2022

This regulation reflects the EU’s ongoing commitment to address human rights violations and to hold accountable those responsible for undermining democracy in Nicaragua.

“`

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2663 of 8 October 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia
“`html

Analysis of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2663

The Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2663, adopted on 8 October 2024, amends Regulation (EU) No 101/2011, which pertains to restrictive measures against certain individuals and entities in light of the situation in Tunisia. This regulation reflects the Council’s ongoing assessment and review of the relevant measures in response to developments in Tunisia.

Key provisions of the regulation include:

• Amendment of Annex I: The regulation specifically modifies Annex I of Regulation (EU) No 101/2011, which lists individuals subject to restrictive measures. It deletes the entries for two persons, namely Moez Ben Moncef Ben Mohamed Trabelsi and Houssem Ben Mohamed Naceur Ben Mohamed Trabelsi, indicating that these individuals are no longer subject to the sanctions previously imposed.
• Rights of Defence and Judicial Protection: The regulation acknowledges the need to consider the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection for the individuals affected by these restrictive measures, which is a critical aspect of EU law and human rights considerations.
• Entry into Force: The regulation stipulates that it will enter into force the day after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union, thus ensuring immediate applicability and enforcement across all EU Member States.
• Binding Nature: The regulation is binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States, reinforcing the authority of EU legislation in member countries and ensuring uniform implementation of the measures across the Union.

This regulation reflects the EU’s ongoing commitment to adapt its legal framework in response to evolving geopolitical circumstances while ensuring adherence to fundamental rights principles.

“`

Council Regulation (EU) 2024/2642 of 8 October 2024 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s destabilizing activities
“`html

Council Regulation (EU) 2024/2642 Overview

The Council Regulation (EU) 2024/2642, adopted on 8 October 2024, establishes a framework for implementing restrictive measures against individuals and entities involved in destabilizing activities associated with Russia. These measures are part of the European Union’s response to threats against democracy, the rule of law, and security within the Union and its Member States.

Key Provisions

Freezing of Funds and Economic Resources

Article 2 mandates the freezing of all funds and economic resources owned or controlled by individuals or entities listed in Annex I. Furthermore, it prohibits the availability of such resources to these listed parties. The regulation targets those responsible for actions undermining democratic processes, supporting violence, or engaging in hybrid activities against Member States.

Grounds for Listing

Individuals and entities may be listed if they are linked to actions that threaten the stability of the Union, including facilitating violent demonstrations, obstructing elections, or manipulating public information. Specific criteria for listing are detailed in Article 2(3), which includes direct involvement in destabilizing actions or support for such activities.

Derogations and Authorizations

Articles 3 to 6 outline the conditions under which the competent authorities may authorize the release of frozen funds. This includes provisions for basic needs, legal fees, and humanitarian assistance, ensuring that essential services are not disrupted while still enforcing sanctions. Notably, humanitarian organizations are exempt from certain restrictions, provided they operate within specified parameters.

Obligations of Listed Persons and Entities

Article 9 requires listed individuals and entities to report their frozen assets to the competent authorities and cooperate in verifying compliance with the regulation. Failure to comply can lead to further penalties, as outlined in Article 15, which emphasizes the need for effective and dissuasive penalties for violations.

Data Protection and Transparency

The regulation includes provisions for the processing of personal data, ensuring compliance with existing EU data protection laws. Articles 16 and 19 highlight that the regulation applies broadly, including to actions taken outside the EU, affecting both EU nationals and entities engaged in business within the Union.

Implementation and Review

Member States are required to designate competent authorities responsible for enforcing the regulation and to communicate their actions to the Commission. Regular reviews of the list of sanctioned individuals and entities are mandated, ensuring that the measures remain relevant and effective.

Conclusion

Council Regulation (EU) 2024/2642 is a comprehensive legal framework aimed at countering destabilizing activities associated with Russia by imposing financial sanctions. Its structured approach to the freezing of assets, coupled with provisions for humanitarian exemptions and strict compliance requirements, reflects the EU’s commitment to uphold democratic values and security within its borders.

“`

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2636 of 8 October 2024 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1194 as regards the responsibilities of professional operators and the template to report survey results of Clavibacter sepedonicus (Spieckermann & Kotthoff 1914) Nouioui et al. 2018
“`html

Analysis of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2636

On 8 October 2024, the European Commission adopted Regulation (EU) 2024/2636, which amends Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1194 concerning the management of Clavibacter sepedonicus, a plant pest affecting potatoes.

Key Provisions

• Professional Operators’ Responsibilities: The regulation clarifies that professional operators, under the supervision of competent authorities, are responsible for ensuring that specified plants designated as infected are destroyed or disposed of properly. This shift acknowledges the challenges faced by authorities in accessing all relevant locations.
• Annual Surveys and Reporting: Member States are required to conduct annual, risk-based surveys for the presence of Clavibacter sepedonicus and report the results to the Commission and other Member States. The reporting template, as outlined in Annex II, has been revised to improve clarity and practical use.
• Amendments to the Template: The amendments to the template include:
  • Exclusion of data on sampling of tubers not intended for planting, as it does not yield significant information.
  • Clarification on laboratory testing results derived from tubers in storage and during visual crop inspections.
  • Reorganization of data recording to ensure that the number of positive visual inspections is only logged after laboratory testing results are obtained.
  • Distinction between symptomatic and asymptomatic samples, which is vital for understanding latent infections and their potential spread.
  • Removal of the requirement to indicate lot sizes in tons to reduce administrative burdens.
  • Clarification that survey results should reflect data from the potato harvest of the year preceding the reporting year to prevent confusion among authorities.
• Entry into Force: The regulation will enter into force 20 days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union, making its provisions binding and directly applicable across all Member States.

Conclusion

This regulation represents a targeted approach to improving the management of Clavibacter sepedonicus within the EU. By enhancing the roles of professional operators and refining the reporting template, the Commission aims to bolster the efficacy of pest surveillance and control measures, thereby protecting agricultural health across Member States.

“`

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2670 of 8 October 2024 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
“`html

Analysis of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2670

The Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2670, adopted on 8 October 2024, amends Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005, which concerns restrictive measures in response to the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).

Key provisions of this regulation include:

Amendments to Annex Ia

Article 1 of the regulation specifies that Annex Ia of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 will be amended. This amendment involves the deletion of two entries from the list of natural or legal persons, entities, and bodies subject to restrictive measures. The specific individuals removed from this list are:

• Evariste BOSHAB
• Alex Kande MUPOMPA

Legal Context

The regulation is grounded in Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005, which allows for the modification of the list of persons and entities affected by the restrictive measures. The changes follow judgments from the General Court in Cases T-88/23 and T-89/23, indicating that the inclusion of these individuals was no longer justified.

Entry into Force

According to Article 2, the regulation will enter into force the day after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union, thus ensuring immediate applicability across all EU Member States.

Binding Nature

This regulation is binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States, reinforcing the EU’s commitment to enforcing its restrictive measures uniformly.

These actions reflect the EU’s ongoing efforts to adapt its stance in response to judicial rulings and the evolving political landscape in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

“`

Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2658 of 3 October 2024 establishing a fisheries closure for hake in GFCM geographical subareas 8, 9, 10 and 11 for demersal longliners flying the flag of Italy and having an overall length equal or superior to 18 meters and inferior to 24 meters
“`html

Overview of Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2658

The Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2658, adopted on 3 October 2024, establishes a fisheries closure specifically for hake in the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM) geographical subareas 8, 9, 10, and 11. This regulation targets demersal longliners that are registered in Italy and have a length between 18 and 24 meters.

Key Provisions

Article 1: Effort Exhaustion

This article declares that the maximum allowable fishing effort for the stock group of hake allocated to Italy for the specified GFCM geographical subareas has been reached. The effective date of this determination is specified in the Annex of the regulation.

Article 2: Prohibitions

Article 2 imposes a ban on fishing activities concerning hake for the specified group of vessels from Italy. It explicitly prohibits these vessels from retaining on board, relocating, transhipping, or landing any hake caught after the closure date set forth in the Annex. This measure is designed to protect the hake stock in the affected areas by preventing further exploitation once the allowable fishing effort has been reached.

Article 3: Entry into Force

This regulation will come into effect the day after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union, ensuring immediate compliance by the member states.

Annex Details

The Annex outlines critical details related to the regulation:

• Member State: Italy
• Fishing Effort Group Code: EFF1/MED2_LL3
• Stock Group: Hake (Merluccius merluccius) in GSAs 8, 9, 10, and 11
• Vessels Concerned: Demersal longliners with lengths equal to or greater than 18 meters and less than 24 meters
• Closing Date: 7 September 2024

The regulation is binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States, reflecting the EU’s commitment to sustainable fishing practices and the conservation of marine resources.

“`

Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2619 of 8 October 2024 amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for fosetyl, potassium phosphonates and disodium phosphonate in or on certain products
“`html

Analysis of Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2619

The Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2619 amends Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 regarding maximum residue levels (MRLs) for the active substances fosetyl, potassium phosphonates, and disodium phosphonate. This regulation is crucial for ensuring food safety by establishing permissible levels of pesticide residues in food products.

Key Provisions

• Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs): The regulation sets MRLs for fosetyl, potassium phosphonates, and disodium phosphonate, which are defined based on their degradation products, primarily phosphonic acid. The residue definition for enforcement has changed from “Fosetyl-Al” to “phosphonic acid and its salts, expressed as phosphonic acid.”
• Assessment of Residues: The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) conducted a review of MRLs, considering not only the active substances but also residues from other agricultural products where these substances are used, such as fertilizers and plant strengtheners. This comprehensive approach ensures that all potential sources of residues are accounted for in setting MRLs.
• Monitoring and Review: The regulation includes provisions for the review of MRLs for various products, depending on the availability of monitoring data. Specific timelines are established for reviewing MRLs for certain fruits and vegetables, allowing for adjustments based on new data.
• Specific MRLs for Various Products: The regulation sets specific MRLs for a wide range of products, including citrus fruits, pome fruits, stone fruits, and various vegetables. For instance, the MRL for oranges is set at 100 mg/kg, while apples and pears have a limit of 70 mg/kg.
• Transitional Arrangements: To facilitate compliance with the new MRLs, the regulation provides transitional arrangements for products placed on the market before the new limits come into effect on April 29, 2025. This allows stakeholders time to adjust to the new requirements.
• Consumer Safety Consideration: Throughout the regulation, it is emphasized that no risk to consumers has been identified with the established MRLs. This ensures that public health remains a priority in the regulation of pesticide residues.

Conclusion

Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2619 represents a significant update to the regulatory framework governing pesticide residues in the European Union. By establishing new MRLs and enhancing the assessment process, the regulation aims to ensure the safety of food products while accommodating the agricultural practices that contribute to pesticide residues.

“`

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2632 of 8 October 2024 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1193 as regards measures on water liable to be infected by Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith 1896) Yabuuchi et al. 1996 emend. Safni et al. 2014, measures to be taken by the professional operators and the template on the reporting of survey results
“`html

Overview of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2632

The Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2632, adopted on 8 October 2024, amends the previous Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1193 regarding measures for controlling the plant pest Ralstonia solanacearum. This regulation introduces several crucial updates aimed at enhancing protective measures against this pest, particularly in relation to water sources that may harbor the pathogen.

Key Provisions

Scope of Measures

The regulation expands the scope of measures to include not only water confirmed to be infected but also water deemed liable to be infected by Ralstonia solanacearum. This ensures that detection and eradication efforts are comprehensive, thereby enhancing the protection of the Union territory from the pest’s potential spread.

Responsibilities of Professional Operators

It emphasizes the role of professional operators in carrying out measures under the supervision of competent authorities. This shift acknowledges the practical challenges faced by authorities in accessing all locations and allows for more effective implementation of control measures.

Amendments to Reporting Templates

The regulation revises the reporting template found in Annex II of the previous regulation. Enhancements include a reorganization of data columns to improve clarity and utility. For example, the order of the columns has been adjusted so that visual inspection results precede laboratory results, ensuring a more logical flow of information. Additionally, new columns have been added for laboratory testing results pertaining to water, which aims to improve the accuracy of survey reporting.

Clarifications on Inspection and Sampling

It delineates between results from symptomatic and asymptomatic samples during visual inspections, which is crucial for understanding the disease’s potential spread. The regulation also addresses the reporting of sample sizes and clarifies that data on the size of lots may not provide significant insights for survey purposes.

Changes in Official Controls

The regulation outlines new official controls related to the use of water designated as infected or liable to be infected. It stipulates that Member States may permit the use of such water under controlled conditions, particularly in greenhouses, provided that appropriate disinfection methods are applied or the water is proven pest-free through rigorous testing.

Entry into Force

The regulation will come into effect twenty days following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union, thereby requiring immediate compliance from Member States to enhance pest management efforts.

Conclusion

Overall, Regulation (EU) 2024/2632 represents a significant step forward in the EU’s strategy to combat Ralstonia solanacearum, particularly through improved measures related to water management, enhanced reporting requirements, and the empowerment of professional operators under official supervision.

“`

Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2633 of 8 October 2024 amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for azoxystrobin, famoxadone, flutriafol, mandipropamid and mefentrifluconazole in or on certain products
“`html

Analysis of Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2633

The Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2633, adopted on 8 October 2024, amends Annex II of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 concerning maximum residue levels (MRLs) for several pesticides, namely azoxystrobin, famoxadone, flutriafol, mandipropamid, and mefentrifluconazole. This regulation is significant as it aligns European Union standards with international Codex Alimentarius maximum residue limits (CXLs) that were recently updated.

The regulation outlines the process of updating MRLs based on the CXLs established by the Codex Alimentarius Commission on 2 December 2023. It emphasizes the necessity for the EU to consider these international standards while maintaining a high level of consumer protection. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) assessed the risks associated with the newly proposed CXLs and identified potential health risks for certain products, leading to reservations being expressed by the EU regarding specific pesticide-product combinations.

Notably, the regulation confirms that CXLs for which no health risks were identified can be adopted into EU law. Specific MRLs for azoxystrobin, famoxadone, flutriafol, mandipropamid, and mefentrifluconazole are included unless they relate to products not listed in Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 or if they are lower than the current MRLs for the respective pesticide-product combinations.

The regulation also addresses specific cases, such as the review of MRLs for mandipropamid in courgettes, where a safe MRL of 0.2 mg/kg was established based on sufficient data. Conversely, for mandipropamid in radish leaves, the EFSA concluded that further consideration was required, leading to the establishment of a specific MRL of 50 mg/kg solely for radish leaves.

Article 1 of the regulation officially amends Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, and Article 2 states that the regulation will come into force twenty days after its publication. The regulation is binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States, reinforcing the EU’s commitment to harmonizing food safety standards across the region.

In summary, this regulation is a crucial step in updating pesticide residue standards within the EU framework, ensuring that they reflect the latest scientific assessments and international guidelines, thereby maintaining consumer safety and confidence in food products.

“`

Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2612 of 7 October 2024 amending Annexes II, III and IV to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for chitosan, clopyralid, difenoconazole, fat distillation residues, flonicamid, hydrolysed proteins, and lavandulyl senecioate in or on certain products
“`html

Analysis of Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2612

The Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2612 amends Annexes II, III, and IV of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 regarding maximum residue levels (MRLs) for various substances in food and feed. These amendments are significant as they reflect updated evaluations of pesticide residues, ensuring consumer safety and compliance with EU standards.

Key Amendments

1. Maximum Residue Levels for Specific Substances

The regulation sets specific MRLs for the pesticide flonicamid, while also modifying existing MRLs for clopyralid and difenoconazole. Notably, for flonicamid, new MRLs are established across various food categories, including fruits, vegetables, and cereals, significantly affecting consumer products such as potatoes, lettuces, and salad plants. The MRLs for clopyralid and difenoconazole in honey, rye, and wheat have also been revised based on recent evaluations.

2. Evaluation Process

Applications for modifications to MRLs were submitted by stakeholders and evaluated by Member States, followed by a thorough assessment by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). The EFSA’s evaluations focused on consumer safety, considering exposure assessments for different consumer groups, which confirmed that the proposed modifications do not pose a risk to health.

3. Inclusion of New Substances

The regulation includes substances such as chitosan, hydrolysed proteins, fat distillation residues, and lavandulyl senecioate in Annex IV. This inclusion indicates that these substances are recognized as low-risk and do not require specific MRLs due to their low likelihood of contaminating food and feed products.

4. Specific MRL Values

The regulation specifies numerical values for MRLs across various food categories. For instance, flonicamid has designated limits for fruits like apples and pears, while clopyralid and difenoconazole have established levels for tree nuts and various vegetables. The regulation details these limits in mg/kg, providing clarity for compliance and monitoring purposes.

5. Regulatory Compliance and Enforcement

The regulation is binding in its entirety and directly applicable across all EU Member States, ensuring uniform enforcement of the new MRLs. It emphasizes the importance of continual monitoring and compliance to safeguard public health and maintain consumer trust in food safety standards.

Conclusion

Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2612 is a crucial step in updating EU pesticide regulations, reflecting the ongoing commitment to consumer safety and environmental protection. The adjustments to MRLs for flonicamid, clopyralid, and difenoconazole, along with the inclusion of new substances, highlight the EU’s proactive approach in adapting to new scientific findings and market needs.

“`

Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2609 of 7 October 2024 amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for napropamide, pyridaben and tebufenpyrad in or on certain products
“`html

Overview of Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2609

The Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2609, adopted on October 7, 2024, amends Annex II of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, which pertains to maximum residue levels (MRLs) for pesticides in food and feed. Specifically, this regulation addresses MRLs for three pesticides: napropamide, pyridaben, and tebufenpyrad.

Key Provisions

• Napropamide:
  • For citrus fruits, strawberries, and cane fruits, the existing MRLs are maintained as the applicant provided sufficient information on storage stability.
  • For blueberries, cranberries, and currants, the MRLs are set to the limit of determination (LOD) due to insufficient data on crop metabolism.
  • For herbs and edible flowers, as well as herbal infusions, the MRLs are also set at the LOD due to missing residue trial information.
• Pyridaben:
  • For pome fruits like apples and pears, new residue data allowed for a lower MRL to be set based on alternative Good Agricultural Practices.
  • For apricots, peaches, and beans, the MRLs are set at the LOD due to lack of residue trial information.
  • For various animal products, including bovine and dairy, the MRLs are maintained at the LOD due to sufficient data provided by the applicant.
• Tebufenpyrad:
  • For apricots, peaches, and blackberries, the MRLs are adjusted based on new residue trials, with lower levels set for apricots and peaches while maintaining levels for blackberries and dewberries.
  • For beans and hops, the MRLs are set at the LOD due to missing analytical method information.
  • For products of animal origin, except honey, the MRLs are maintained as the applicant provided sufficient information.
  • For honey and apiculture products, the existing MRL is maintained at the LOD due to insufficient analytical method information.

Implementation Timeline

The new MRLs will apply from April 28, 2025, allowing a transition period for compliance. Products placed on the market before this date will not be affected by the new MRLs, except for tebufenpyrad in table grapes.

Conclusion

This regulation reflects the Commission’s ongoing commitment to ensure food safety and consumer protection by establishing clear and updated residue limits for pesticides in various food products. The adjustments to MRLs are based on scientific assessments and submissions from applicants regarding pesticide residues.

“`

Regulation (EU) 2024/2594 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2024 laying down conservation, management and control measures applicable in the area covered by the Convention on future multilateral cooperation in the North-East Atlantic fisheries, amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009, and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1236/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulations (EEC) No 1899/85 and (EEC) No 1638/87
“`html

Regulation (EU) 2024/2594 Overview

Regulation (EU) 2024/2594 establishes a comprehensive framework for the conservation, management, and control of fisheries in the North-East Atlantic, aligning with the principles of sustainable fishing as outlined in the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). The Regulation integrates various recommendations from the North-East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC) and introduces measures that are binding for EU Member States and fishing operators.

General Provisions

The Regulation lays out the subject matter, which includes implementing NEAFC’s Scheme of Control and Enforcement into EU law, and establishing specific measures for pelagic fisheries in designated areas. It clarifies that the provisions apply alongside existing fisheries regulations.

NEAFC Measures

Scope and Definitions

The Regulation applies to EU fishing vessels operating in the NEAFC Regulatory Area, including third-country vessels when specified. It provides definitions for key terms such as “vulnerable marine ecosystems” (VMEs), “contracting parties,” and various fishing activities, ensuring clarity in enforcement and compliance.

Conservation Measures

Specific prohibitions are established against bottom trawling and static gear fishing outside designated areas, especially concerning VMEs. Procedures for reporting encounters with VME indicator species are outlined, requiring immediate cessation of fishing activities in the vicinity of such encounters.

Technical and Conservation Measures

The Regulation mandates assessments for exploratory bottom fishing activities, requiring detailed plans from Member States and compliance with specific technical measures. It also outlines restrictions on fishing gear and operational practices to protect vulnerable species and habitats.

Control and Enforcement Measures

General Provisions

Member States are required to designate contact points for receiving reports and data according to the Regulation. They must ensure that their fishing vessels are compliant with NEAFC recommendations and manage their fishing efforts in line with available quotas.

Inspection and Surveillance

The Regulation establishes protocols for inspections and surveillance of fishing activities, including joint inspections by Member States and NEAFC inspectors. It emphasizes non-discrimination in inspections and provides guidelines for the conduct and reporting of inspection activities.

Port State Control

Port Member States must designate ports for landing, transshipment, and other services, ensuring compliance with the FAO Agreement on Port State Measures. They are required to implement prior notification procedures for vessels intending to enter their ports and to conduct inspections of non-Contracting Party vessels.

Infringement Procedures

The Regulation outlines procedures for handling infringements, categorizing serious infringements and detailing the responsibilities of Member States in addressing violations. It emphasizes timely communication of infringement reports and mandates appropriate measures against offenders.

Data Management and Protection

Personal data collected under this Regulation shall be processed in accordance with EU data protection laws. The Regulation stipulates that data must be stored securely and outlines the responsibilities of various authorities in managing this data.

Final Provisions

The Regulation includes provisions for amendments, the repeal of previous regulations, and entry into force. It binds all Member States and is directly applicable, ensuring a unified approach to fisheries management in the North-East Atlantic.

“`

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2621 of 1 October 2024 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature
“`html

Analysis of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2621

The Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2621, adopted on 1 October 2024, specifies the classification of certain goods within the Combined Nomenclature (CN). This regulation aims to ensure a uniform application of the Combined Nomenclature, which is crucial for the proper administration of customs duties and trade measures within the European Union.

Key Provisions

Article 1

Article 1 states that the goods described in the Annex of the regulation will be classified under the CN code provided in the same Annex. This classification is essential for determining the applicable tariff rates and measures related to these goods.

Article 2

Article 2 allows for a transitional period of three months during which binding tariff information that does not conform to this new regulation may still be invoked by the holders. This provision provides a safeguard for businesses and individuals who may have relied on previous classifications before the new regulation came into effect.

Article 3

Article 3 establishes that the regulation will enter into force twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union, ensuring that all Member States are bound to comply with the new classification rules without delay.

Annex Details

The Annex contains a detailed description of a specific product, a tactical response robot, which is classified under CN code 8424 89 70. This robot features a range of functionalities suitable for firefighting and recovery operations, including:

• A track-mounted chassis powered by electric drive motors.
• A camera system for live image transmission.
• LED spotlights for visibility.
• A firefighting dispersing device capable of delivering water or foam at high pressure.
• A cable winch for handling large loads.

The classification justification is based on the general rules for interpreting the Combined Nomenclature, particularly noting that despite its significant tractive force, the robot does not qualify as a vehicle under headings 8701 or 8705, as it lacks the essential characteristics of vehicles designed for hauling or pushing. Instead, it is classified as a composite machine, with the dispersing function being its principal function.

Conclusion

This regulation exemplifies the European Commission’s ongoing efforts to streamline customs processes and ensure clarity in the classification of goods, which is vital for trade operations within the EU. By providing a clear framework for the classification of complex goods like tactical response robots, the regulation aids manufacturers and importers in navigating the customs landscape effectively.

“`

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2617 of 1 October 2024 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature
“`html

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2617

This Regulation establishes the classification of specific goods in the Combined Nomenclature, as outlined in the Annex. The objective is to ensure uniform application of the Combined Nomenclature, which is integral to the European Union’s customs framework.

Key Provisions

Article 1

The goods listed in column (1) of the table in the Annex will be classified under the CN code specified in column (2) of the same table. This classification provides clarity on how the goods should be treated under EU customs regulations.

Article 2

Binding tariff information that does not align with this Regulation may still be utilized for a period of three months from the date this Regulation comes into effect. This provision allows for a transitional phase where existing tariff classifications can still be relied upon, as per Article 34(9) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013.

Article 3

This Regulation will take effect twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. It is binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States, ensuring that the classification rules are uniformly enforced across the EU.

Annex Overview

The Annex details a specific good: a projector with a built-in television tuner, defined by its dimensions and technical features. The product is equipped with advanced functionalities, including:

• Wireless connectivity (Bluetooth and Wi-Fi)
• Smart TV capabilities with intelligent assistants (e.g., Google Assistant, Bixby, Alexa)
• Compatibility with the Internet of Things (IoT)
• Digital and analog TV tuners
• 4K resolution (3840 × 2160 pixels)
• Built-in speakers with 2.2 channel surround sound
• Multiple HDMI and USB ports, digital audio output, and Ethernet connectivity
• Antenna for TV signal reception

This device can receive and reproduce television and video signals, projecting images onto an external screen or wall, which qualifies it as a video display device under the Combined Nomenclature.

Classification Details

The projector is classified under CN code 8528 72 10 as television projection equipment. This classification is based on the general rules for interpreting the Combined Nomenclature and specific characteristics of the device:

• It incorporates a television tuner, categorizing it as a reception apparatus for television.
• Despite lacking an integrated monitor, it is considered a video display device due to its projection capabilities.
• It is specifically designed for projecting images, confirming its classification as projection equipment incorporating television reception capabilities.

Overall, this regulation clarifies how a technologically advanced projector with a television tuner should be classified for customs purposes within the EU, ensuring compliance with established customs codes.

“`

Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2608 of 7 October 2024 amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the use of powdered cellulose (E 460(ii)) and glucono-delta-lactone (E 575) in unripened soft spreadable cheese products
“`html

Analysis of Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2608

The Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2608, adopted on 7 October 2024, amends Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 concerning the usage of powdered cellulose (E 460(ii)) and glucono-delta-lactone (E 575) in unripened soft spreadable cheese products. This amendment is significant as it updates the Union list of approved food additives, allowing these substances to be used specifically in the production of unripened soft spreadable cheese.

The regulation outlines that powdered cellulose (E 460(ii)) and glucono-delta-lactone (E 575) were already authorized for various food products. However, following applications submitted on 28 July 2022, the European Commission has now extended their approval to include unripened soft spreadable cheese, categorized under food category 01.7.6 ‘Cheese products (excluding products falling in category 16)’.

The intended use of glucono-delta-lactone (E 575) is to acidify the milk mixture and facilitate the coagulation of casein efficiently, without the need for lactic acid bacteria. Meanwhile, powdered cellulose (E 460(ii)) serves to bind whey, preventing separation from the curd, thereby ensuring product stability throughout its shelf life. This innovative application is expected to enhance production efficiency by reducing the need for raw materials, energy, and processing time.

The regulation states that prior to the amendment, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) had evaluated the safety of both additives. In January 2018, EFSA concluded that powdered cellulose (E 460(ii)) did not require a numerical acceptable daily intake (ADI) due to its low safety concern at the reported usage levels. Similarly, glucono-delta-lactone (E 575) was assessed in 1990, and its ADI was deemed ‘not specified’, indicating that its consumption at existing levels does not pose health hazards.

The regulation emphasizes that the proposed uses of these additives in unripened soft spreadable cheese products are not expected to affect human health adversely, thereby negating the need for further consultation with the EFSA. As a result, the amendments to Annex II of Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 were deemed appropriate and necessary.

The amendments specifically state that:

• For powdered cellulose (E 460(ii)), the entry is modified to allow its use in “only grated and sliced ripened and unripened products; unripened soft spreadable cheese products” with a quantum satis specification.
• For glucono-delta-lactone (E 575), the entry is updated to permit its use in “only ripened products; unripened soft spreadable cheese products” also with a quantum satis specification.

This regulation will enter into force twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union, thus making it binding and directly applicable in all Member States.

“`

Decision No 1/2024 of the EU-Egypt Association Council of 1 October 2024 amending the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Arab Republic of Egypt, of the other part, by replacing Protocol 4 thereto concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation [2024/2653]
“`html

Analysis of Decision No 1/2024 of the EU-Egypt Association Council

On October 1, 2024, the EU-Egypt Association Council adopted Decision No 1/2024, which amends Protocol 4 of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement. This protocol concerns the definition of ‘originating products’ and the methods of administrative cooperation between the European Communities and the Arab Republic of Egypt.

Key Provisions

Article 1: Replacement of Protocol 4

This article states that Protocol 4 is replaced by a new text that is annexed to the decision. This new protocol will set out the rules regarding the definition of originating products and the methods for administrative cooperation.

Article 2: Entry into Force

This article specifies that the decision shall enter into force and apply from the date of its adoption, which is October 1, 2024.

Annex: New Protocol 4

Article 1: Applicable Rules of Origin

The new protocol establishes that the rules of origin will be based on the provisions of the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin. This includes references to Appendices I and II, which outline the relevant rules and procedures.

Article 2: Alternative Applicable Rules of Origin

This article introduces the concept of “Transitional rules” of origin, which will apply until the amendment of the Convention enters into force. Goods that meet these alternative rules will also be considered as having preferential origin.

Article 3: Dispute Settlement

Disputes regarding verification procedures will be submitted to the Association Council if they cannot be settled between the customs authorities of the parties involved. Settlements between importers and customs authorities will adhere to the legislation of the importing country.

Article 4: Amendments to the Protocol

This provision allows the Association Council to amend the new protocol’s provisions as necessary.

Article 5: Withdrawal from the Convention

If either party intends to withdraw from the Convention, they must notify the depositary, and negotiations on new rules of origin will commence immediately. Until new rules are in place, existing rules will continue to apply.

Objectives of the Transitional Rules of Origin

The transitional rules aim to make the qualification of preferential originating status for goods easier by introducing more relaxed standards. These rules will coexist with the existing rules of the Convention, leading to the establishment of two distinct zones of cumulation.

General Provisions of the New Protocol

The new protocol outlines the definitions of originating products, requirements for sufficient working or processing, rules for cumulation of origin, and stipulations regarding the proof of origin. It also details the conditions under which non-originating materials can be used without affecting the originating status of the final product.

Administrative Cooperation and Verification

Articles regarding administrative cooperation emphasize the need for customs authorities to assist one another in verifying the authenticity of proofs of origin and other required documentation. Specific provisions are included for the handling of discrepancies and the preservation of documentary evidence.

Special Conditions for Ceuta and Melilla

Special provisions are made concerning products originating in Ceuta and Melilla, ensuring they receive the same customs treatment as products originating from the European Union, provided they meet specific conditions.

Conclusion

Decision No 1/2024 marks a significant step in enhancing trade relations between the EU and Egypt by providing a clearer framework for the rules of origin. The introduction of transitional rules aims to facilitate trade by relaxing some existing requirements while ensuring compliance with the overarching goals of the Euro-Mediterranean partnership.

“`

Agreement between the Kingdom of Norway and the European Union on a Norwegian Financial Mechanism for the period May 2021–April 2028
“`html

Agreement Between the Kingdom of Norway and the European Union on a Norwegian Financial Mechanism (2021-2028)

Objectives

The Kingdom of Norway commits to reducing economic and social disparities within the European Economic Area (EEA) and strengthening relations with Beneficiary States through a Norwegian Financial Mechanism, focusing on thematic priorities outlined in Article 3.

This mechanism is grounded in the principles of human dignity, democracy, equality, rule of law, and human rights, ensuring that all funded activities reflect these values.

Financial Commitments

The total financial contribution amounts to EUR 1,380,000,000, with an additional EUR 83,000,000 allocated for projects addressing challenges resulting from the invasion of Ukraine. This funding will be disbursed in annual tranches of EUR 209,000,000 from May 2021 to April 2028.

Thematic Priorities

Country-specific allocations will target three main thematic areas:

• European green transition
• Democracy, rule of law, and human rights
• Social inclusion and resilience

These themes will guide the selection of programme areas, which will be developed in consultation with Beneficiary States based on their specific needs.

Memoranda of Understanding

To ensure effective implementation, Norway will negotiate a Memorandum of Understanding with each Beneficiary State, aligning with EU policies and recommendations. Consultations with the European Commission will also occur to foster synergies with EU cohesion policy.

Co-Financing and Liability

Norway’s financial contribution for each programme shall not exceed 85% of the total cost, adhering to applicable State aid rules. Norway’s liability is limited to fund provision, with no responsibility for third-party claims.

Country-Specific Allocations

Allocations are distributed among various Beneficiary States, including Bulgaria, Poland, and Romania, with specific amounts detailed for each state.

Funds Established

Three distinct funds will be established under the Norwegian Financial Mechanism:

1. Fund for Civil Society: 10% of total funds, with 5% for transnational initiatives.
2. Fund for Capacity Building: 2% for cooperation with international organizations.
3. Fund for Social Dialogue: 1% dedicated to promoting decent work.

Implementation Principles

Implementation will follow principles of transparency, accountability, efficiency, and good governance. Norway will manage the funds, with Beneficiary States responsible for implementing approved programmes.

Beneficiary States will submit programme proposals, which Norway will evaluate and approve. Compliance checks may lead to payment suspensions or fund recoveries if obligations are not met.

Reporting and Management Costs

Norway is responsible for reporting on its contributions, with management costs covered within the total financial allocation.

Ratification and Entry into Force

The Agreement requires ratification by the Parties and will take effect following the deposit of the last ratification instrument.

Annex

The Annex outlines various programme areas, including green transition, public health, and justice sector initiatives, with an emphasis on mainstreaming gender equality and digitalization across all areas.

For further details, refer to the official documentation provided in multiple languages.

“`

Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway
“`html

Analysis of the Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway

The Additional Protocol establishes special provisions for the importation of certain fish and fishery products from Norway to the European Union (EU). This Protocol is a continuation of the existing trade arrangements and aims to facilitate and regulate the duty-free import of these products during the specified period.

Article 1 – Special Provisions for Imports

This article outlines that the import provisions are detailed within the Protocol and its Annex. It specifies that annual duty-free tariff quotas will be applicable for imports from Norway, covering the period from May 1, 2021, to April 30, 2028. A review of these quotas will take place at the end of this period, considering all relevant interests.

Article 2 – Tariff Quotas

Article 2 details the process for opening tariff quotas, which will commence when the Protocol is provisionally applied. The first quota will be available until April 30, 2024, with subsequent quotas allocated annually from May 1 to April 30. Additionally, any unutilized quotas can be carried forward for up to two years following the end of the specified period, unless a new protocol is enacted.

Article 3 – Free Transit Arrangement

This article mandates Norway to ensure the free transit of fish and fishery products that are landed in Norway from EU-flagged vessels. This arrangement is valid for up to two years after the expiration of the tariff quotas, ensuring continued trade facilitation.

Article 4 – Rules of Origin

The rules of origin applicable to the tariff quotas are specified to be those outlined in Protocol 3 of the original Agreement signed on May 14, 1973. This ensures consistency in the origin requirements for the products in question.

Article 5 – Ratification and Provisional Application

Article 5 describes the procedures for ratification or approval of the Protocol by both parties, with the requirement that instruments of ratification be deposited with the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union. The Protocol will enter into force on the first day of the second month after the last ratification is deposited, with provisional application commencing earlier under specified conditions.

Article 6 – Languages and Deposit

This article states that the Protocol is drafted in multiple languages, all of which are considered equally authentic. It will be deposited with the General Secretariat of the Council, which will provide certified copies to the respective parties.

Annex – Special Provisions for Tariff Quotas

The Annex lists specific products and their corresponding annual duty-free tariff quota volumes. Key products include various types of frozen fish, fillets, and prepared seafood, with distinct quota volumes assigned to each category. The totality of these quotas reflects the EU’s commitment to maintaining a structured and regulated trade environment for fishery products from Norway.

“`

Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Iceland
“`html

Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Iceland

This Protocol establishes special provisions concerning the import of certain fish and fishery products from Iceland into the European Union (EU). It is an extension of the existing trade agreement between the EU and Iceland, originally signed in 1972, and aims to facilitate trade while ensuring compliance with established quotas and regulations.

Article 1: Special Provisions for Imports

The Protocol outlines that specific provisions for the import of certain fish and fishery products from Iceland will be in effect. These provisions include annual duty-free tariff quotas, which are detailed in the Annex of the Protocol. The quotas will be applicable from the date the Protocol is provisionally applied until April 30, 2028. Following this period, the parties will assess the necessity of continuing these provisions and may adjust the quota levels based on relevant interests.

Article 2: Opening of Tariff Quotas

The tariff quotas will commence on the effective date of the Protocol’s provisional application. The first quota will be available until April 30, 2024, after which subsequent quotas will be allocated annually from May 1 to April 30 until the end of the designated period. If any quotas are not fully utilized, the remaining volume can be carried over for up to two years unless a new protocol is established.

Article 3: Rules of Origin

The Protocol stipulates that the rules of origin for the products eligible for the tariff quotas will adhere to those set forth in Protocol 3 of the original 1972 Agreement. This ensures that the products qualify for the quotas based on their origin, maintaining the integrity of the trade agreement.

Article 4: Ratification and Entry into Force

This Protocol requires ratification or approval by both parties according to their respective procedures. It will enter into force on the first day of the second month following the last ratification. Until that time, the Protocol will be provisionally applied starting from the third month after the last notification of intention to apply it.

Article 5: Multilingual Authenticity

The Protocol is drafted in multiple languages, including all official EU languages and Icelandic, with each version being equally authentic. The original document will be deposited with the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union, which will provide certified copies to both parties.

Annex: Special Provisions for Tariff Quotas

The Annex details the specific tariff quotas for various fish and fishery products originating from Iceland, including frozen herrings, lobsters, cod preparations, and several species of fish. Each product is assigned a specific CN code along with its annual quota volume in net weight. These quotas provide a framework for the amount of each product that can be imported duty-free, thus facilitating trade while ensuring compliance with the agreed limits.

“`

Agreement between the European Union, Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein and the Kingdom of Norway on an EEA Financial Mechanism for the period May 2021–April 2028
“`html

Agreement on the EEA Financial Mechanism (2021–2028)

The Agreement between the European Union, Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein, and the Kingdom of Norway outlines a framework for the EEA Financial Mechanism for the period from May 2021 to April 2028. This mechanism aims to address economic and social disparities within the European Economic Area (EEA) and enhance relations among the participating states.

Article 1 – Objectives and Principles

The EFTA States (Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway) commit to contributing towards reducing disparities in economic and social conditions across the EEA. The mechanism is anchored in core values such as human dignity, democracy, rule of law, and human rights. All funded initiatives must align with these principles and avoid any operations that could undermine them.

Article 2 – Financial Commitments

The total financial contribution under this agreement is set at EUR 1,705,000,000, with an additional EUR 100,000,000 dedicated to addressing challenges arising from the invasion of Ukraine. This funding will be disbursed in annual tranches of EUR 257,860,000 from May 2021 to April 2028.

Article 3 – Thematic Priorities

The funding will focus on three thematic priorities:

• European green transition
• Democracy, rule of law, and human rights
• Social inclusion and resilience

Program areas under these themes will be adapted to meet the specific needs of each Beneficiary State, considering factors such as size and contribution levels.

Article 4 – Memoranda of Understanding

The EFTA States will negotiate Memoranda of Understanding with each Beneficiary State to ensure efficient implementation and alignment with EU policies. Strategic consultations with the European Commission will also occur to foster synergy with EU cohesion policy.

Article 5 – Co-financing and Liability

The EFTA contribution for programs will not exceed 85% of the total program costs. Beneficiary States must comply with applicable State aid rules, and the EFTA States’ liability is limited to the funds provided as per the agreement.

Article 6 – Country Specific Allocations

Allocations are designated for several Beneficiary States, including Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, and others, with specific funding amounts outlined for each. These allocations are aimed at facilitating targeted support based on the needs of each country.

Article 7 – Funds

Two dedicated funds are established:

1. Fund for Civil Society: 10% of the total budget, with 5% allocated to transnational initiatives.
2. Fund for Capacity Building: 2% for cooperation with international organizations and institutions.

Article 8 – Coordination

The EEA Financial Mechanism will be coordinated closely with Norway’s bilateral contributions to ensure consistency and efficiency across both financial frameworks.

Article 9 – Implementation Framework

The implementation of the EEA Financial Mechanism will involve cooperation between Beneficiary States and the EFTA States, ensuring transparency, accountability, and adherence to good governance principles. The EFTA States will manage the funds and oversee the execution of the programs, with Beneficiary States responsible for program implementation.

Article 10 – Review

A review of the mechanism’s effectiveness and the ongoing need to address economic and social disparities will occur at the end of the specified period, ensuring that the objectives remain relevant and adequately addressed.

Annex – Program Areas

The Annex details specific program areas under the thematic priorities, including green business, public health, justice sector improvements, and more, emphasizing the importance of gender equality and digitalization across all initiatives.

“`[:]