Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Ваш AI помічникНовий чат
    ↵
    Open chat icon
    EU legislation (detailed)

    Review of the EU legislation for 17/09/2026

    1 hour ago 0 0

    Please provide the text or the list of legislative acts you wish me to analyze. You have not included the content in your message. Once provided, I will deliver a concise, professional summary of the core regulatory content for each act.

    Review of each of legal acts published today:

    Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/2102 of 13 July 2026 amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of relevant commodities and relevant products


    Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/2093 of 10 July 2026 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards national payments for the distillation of wine, green harvesting and grubbing up of productive vineyards in justified cases of crisis


    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/2078 of 9 September 2026 on the registration of the geographical indication Olio dei Colli di Bologna (PGI) in the Union register of geographical indications pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2024/1143 of the European Parliament and of the Council


    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/2046 of 14 September 2026 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/964 as regards administrative and minor changes to the Union authorisation for the biocidal product family SOPUROXID


    Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 September 2026.Absara Industrial, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark KROMAT – Earlier EU word mark CROMA – Technical issue during the production of evidence by one of the parties – Reopening of the proceedings – Audi alteram partem rule – Second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Probative value of the evidence of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.Case T-467/25.


    Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 16 September 2026.Worldwide Machinery Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark – Proceedings for the assignment of the EU trade mark – EU figurative mark SUPERIOR MANUFACTURING – Article 53(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 – Concept of ‘agent or representative’ – Rejection of the request for assignment – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.Case T-566/25.


    Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 September 2026.EB v European Central Bank.Civil service – ECB Staff – Short-term contract – Termination before appointment has been taken up – Breakdown in the relationship of trust – Notice period.Case T-287/24.


    Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 September 2026.Fitmart Gmbh & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ULTRAPURE – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article (7)(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.Case T-890/25.


    Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 September 2026.Roman Trotsenko v Council of the European Union.Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Duty to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Right to property – Proportionality.Case T-459/24.


    Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 September 2026.Société des produits Nestlé SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark FITNESS – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.Case T-509/25.


    Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 September 2026.Sudex OÜ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Remington SYNERGY WORLD – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.Case T-885/25.


    Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 September 2026.Polina Sergeevna Gagarina v Council of the European Union.Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘support of actions which undermine the territorial integrity of Ukraine’ – Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Duty to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Freedom of expression and freedom of the arts.Case T-460/24.


    Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 September 2026.Cobra Golf Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark ULTRADRY – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.Case T-827/25.


    Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 September 2026.Fissore Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Fissore – Earlier EU figurative mark CristianoFissore – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No peaceful coexistence between the marks at issue – No limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Article 61(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.Case T-60/25.


    Agreement between the European Union, of the one part, and the Government of Japan, of the other part, on the participation of the Government of Japan in Union programmes


    Decision No 1/2026 of the Joint Committee established under the Protocol to the Agreement on the international occasional carriage of passengers by coach and bus (Interbus Agreement) regarding the international regular and special regular carriage of passengers by coach and bus of 2 June 2026 establishing its Rules of Procedure [2026/2080]

    Leave a comment

    Leave a comment

    You May Also Like

    View All
    December 24, 2024
    Review of the EU legislation for 24/12/2024
    June 19, 2025
    Review of the EU legislation for 19/06/2025
    E-mail
    Password
    Confirm Password
    Lexcovery
    Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.