Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Review of Ukrainian Supreme Court’s decisions for 17/01/2025

Case No. 756/5368/19 dated 08/01/2025 The court, when rendering its decision, was guided by the fact that the plaintiff did not participate in the apartment privatization and did not acquire ownership rights to its part, as the donation agreement was declared invalid. Therefore, she does not have a legally protected interest in amending the property ownership…

Review of Ukrainian Supreme Court’s decisions for 13/01/2025

Case No. 824/91/24 dated 03/01/2025 Subject of the dispute - consideration of a divorce case. Since this decision contains confidential information and is prohibited from disclosure under paragraph 4, part 1, article 7 of the Law of Ukraine "On Access to Court Decisions", a detailed analysis of the court's arguments is not possible. Such restrictions are…

Review of Ukrainian Supreme Court’s decisions for 12/01/2025

Case No. 317/3658/20 dated 06/01/2025 The subject of review was a cassation appeal by the defense counsel against the first instance court judgment and the appellate court ruling regarding the accusation of a person for committing a series of criminal offenses. The court partially satisfied the cassation appeal, guided by the fact that the defendant's actions…

Case No. 148/382/20 dated 27/12/2024

The court, in rendering its decision, was guided by the following considerations: 1) the right of a grandfather to communicate with his grandchildren must be exercised taking into account the best interests of the children; 2) the relationship between a grandfather and grandchildren differs in nature from the relationship between parents and children and requires…

Review of Ukrainian Supreme Court’s decisions for 11/01/2025

Case No. 120/19027/23 dated 07/01/2025 The court, when rendering its decision, was guided by the following: 1) no retail trade or cash settlements were carried out at the oil depot, therefore, the requirements for cash register use do not apply to this facility; 2) the company maintained proper accounting of petroleum products in accordance with established…

Review of Ukrainian Supreme Court’s decisions for 10/01/2025

Case No. 991/4005/22 dated 03/01/2025 Main arguments of the court: The court established that PERSON_12 incited the provision of an illegal benefit to the Prosecutor General by voicing the mechanism and amount (100,000 US dollars) for resolving the issue of property return and criminal case closure. PERSON_11, being the head of a department in the Office…

Review of Ukrainian Supreme Court’s decisions for 09/01/2025

Case No. 640/524/20 dated 03/01/2025 The court noted that the decision of the personnel commission regarding unsuccessful certification must be properly substantiated and contain specific facts and evidence, rather than just general formulations about 'reasonable doubts'. At the same time, the absence of bringing the prosecutor to responsibility does not exclude the possibility of evaluating their…

Review of Ukrainian Supreme Court’s decisions for 04/01/2025

Case No. 440/4083/22 dated 30/12/2024 The court noted that when examining the case, it is necessary to establish: 1) whether the price changes under additional agreements to procurement contracts were lawful; 2) whether market price fluctuations were documentarily confirmed as a basis for concluding additional agreements; 3) whether the total price increase did not exceed 10%…

Review of Ukrainian Supreme Court’s decisions for 03/01/2025

Case No. 759/23110/19 dated 25/12/2024 Subject of the dispute - recovery of debt under a construction contract for centralized sewerage works. The court, when rendering the decision, was guided by the following: 1) the customer's signing of work completion certificates without objections indicates acceptance of the works and recognition of their cost; 2) failure to conduct…

Review of Ukrainian Supreme Court’s decisions for 30/12/2024

Case No. 522/9421/22 dated 16/12/2024 The Court of Cassation Instance noted that the courts of first and appellate instances incorrectly included the period between the closure of criminal proceedings and the cancellation of the closure order in the pre-trial investigation period. The Supreme Court referred to the legal position of the Joint Chamber of the Criminal…
E-mail
Password
Confirm Password