This judgment concerns multiple applications against Ukraine regarding inadequate conditions of detention and lack of effective remedies. The Court examined nine applications jointly due to their similar subject matter.The Court found violations of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention concerning poor detention conditions in various Ukrainian detention facilities between 2020 and 2024. The violations…

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) delivered a judgment in the case of Bagatyy v. Ukraine concerning the unlawful detention of the applicant. The Court found that Ukraine violated Article 5 § 3 of the Convention due to the lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for the applicant's pre-trial detention during the period from…

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) delivered a judgment in the case of Berezovskyy v. Ukraine concerning the ineffective investigation of a life-threatening traffic accident that occurred in 2013. The Court found that Ukraine violated Article 2 § 1 of the Convention by failing to conduct an effective investigation into the incident where the…

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) delivered a judgment in the case of Shchegolkov and Others v. Ukraine, concerning four applications against Ukraine regarding excessive length of pre-trial detention. The Court found violations of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in all cases, determining that the duration of pre-trial detention was unreasonably long.…

This decision concerns multiple applications against Ukraine regarding inadequate conditions of detention and lack of effective remedies. The Court joined eight applications due to their similar subject matter, finding violations of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention.The Court examined complaints about poor detention conditions in the Kyiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility, including overcrowding (2.4-5.8 m²…

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) delivered a judgment in the case of Politun and Others v. Ukraine, which consolidated 14 applications concerning inadequate conditions of detention in Ukrainian penitentiary facilities. The Court found violations of Articles 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) and 13 (right to an effective remedy) of the European…

This judgment concerns multiple applications against Ukraine regarding inadequate conditions of detention and lack of effective remedies. The Court examined 16 applications jointly due to their similar subject matter. The Court found violations of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention concerning poor detention conditions and lack of effective remedies. The specific violations included overcrowding,…

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) delivered a judgment in the case of Melikhov and Others v. Ukraine, which consolidated six separate applications concerning excessive length of criminal proceedings in Ukraine and the lack of effective remedies for this issue.The Court found violations of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within…

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) delivered a judgment in the case of Raychenko and Others v. Ukraine, which consolidated 15 similar applications concerning disproportionate sanctions in customs cases. The cases involved situations where applicants failed to declare cash exceeding the permitted limit of 10,000 euros when crossing Ukrainian borders, resulting in both confiscation…

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) delivered a judgment in the case of Koptyelov and Others v. Ukraine, which consolidated eight separate applications concerning excessive length of civil proceedings in Ukraine and lack of effective remedies for such violations.The Court found violations of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) and Article…

The case concerns a dispute over the organization of an LGBTI rights 'Equality March' in Kyiv in 2013. The European Court of Human Rights found violations of Article 11 (freedom of assembly) and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) of the Convention.The Court determined that the ban on demonstrations in Kyiv's city center, which…

The decision concerns the case of Suren Antonyan v. Armenia regarding the dismissal of a judge following disciplinary proceedings before the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC). The Court examined three main aspects: Whether the SJC satisfied the requirements of an independent tribunal under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention Whether the applicant was…

The case concerns a search conducted at a lawyer's home in Ukraine in 2013 in connection with criminal proceedings against his client. The Court found violations of Articles 8 and 13 of the Convention.The key aspects of the decision are:The search warrant was overly broad and lacked sufficient reasoning to justify the belief that relevant…