The court noted that issuing a certificate of monetary support is one of the stages in exercising the right to pension recalculation, and therefore the 6-month period for filing a lawsuit does not apply to such disputes. The court emphasized that applying this period would make it impossible to exercise the right to pension recalculation,…
Here's a review of the key legal acts:
Road Safety Enforcement Directive
The directive expands cross-border enforcement of traffic rules by adding new offenses like dangerous overtaking and hit-and-run incidents. It mandates use of EUCARIS system for data exchange, requires standardized traffic offense notices with translations, and creates an online portal for road safety information. Private…
The Strategic Partnership Agreement (SPA) between the EU and Japan represents a comprehensive framework for enhanced cooperation and strategic coordination between these major global powers. This legally binding agreement covers various areas of cooperation, including security, trade, environmental protection, and cultural exchange. The Agreement consists of several sections addressing political dialogue, global challenges, economic cooperation,…
This Regulation establishes detailed rules for the operation of the CBAM (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism) registry - a standardized electronic database for managing CBAM certificates, declarations, and registrations. The registry will serve as the central platform for all CBAM-related operations between the EU authorities and economic operators.The act consists of 4 chapters and 24 articles,…
This Directive amends Directive (EU) 2015/413 to strengthen cross-border enforcement of road safety rules and facilitate information exchange between EU member states regarding traffic offenses.The key changes include:Expanding the scope of covered traffic offenses to include new violations like dangerous overtaking, wrong-way driving, failing to keep safe distance, and hit-and-run incidents Establishing detailed requirements for…
No new legal acts were published today
No new decisions were published today
Case No. 947/30578/21 dated 18/12/2024
The court found that the gas disconnection was unlawful, which is confirmed by a previous court decision. The court took into account that the plaintiff had the right to 40% of gas consumption in the house according to the contract, and not to the entire gas supply. Regarding moral damages, the…
No new legal acts were published today
No new legal acts were published today
No new decisions were published today
Case No. 824/105/24 dated 19/12/2024
The court refused to cancel the arbitration decision because the defendant company did not object to the appointed arbitrator during the arbitration proceedings and did not challenge him, but attempted to challenge only after losing the case. Moreover, the company itself had previously proposed arbitrator candidates who were Ukrainian citizens, and…
The court was guided by the fact that according to the new Law No. 3886-IX dated 18.07.2024, which came into effect on 09.08.2024, the limits of petty theft were changed - now it amounts to up to 2 non-taxable minimum incomes of citizens (previously it was up to 0.2). Since the value of the stolen…
The Court concluded that the restriction on the payment of one-time financial assistance only within two years after the initial establishment of disability contradicts the Constitution of Ukraine. The Supreme Court deviated from previous practice and indicated that such restrictions cannot be applied, as they violate the principle of the rule of law and constitutional…
Subject of the dispute - appealing a court verdict regarding theft of property valued at 1,273 hryvnias and 44 kopiykas, committed by breaking into a premises. The court was guided by the fact that after the adoption of Law No. 3886-IX dated 18.07.2024, the threshold value of property for qualifying theft as a criminal offense…
The court was guided by the fact that limiting the right to receive a higher amount of assistance only within two years after the initial establishment of disability contradicts the Constitution of Ukraine, as it unjustifiably restricts the right of servicemen to social protection. This is confirmed by the Decision of the Constitutional Court dated…
The court was guided by the fact that the restriction on benefit payments only within two years after the initial establishment of disability contradicts the Constitution of Ukraine, as it disproportionately limits the right to social protection of servicemembers. The Supreme Court deviated from previous practice and decided that such restrictions cannot be applied, as…
The court, in rendering its decision, was guided by the fact that the restriction on the payment of one-time financial assistance only within two years after the initial determination of disability is contrary to the Constitution of Ukraine. The court noted that after this norm was declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, it…
