Here is the translation:
Subject of Dispute: Legality of Dismissal of a Civil Servant Due to Liquidation of a State Body.
Key Arguments of the Court:
1. The Supreme Court established that in fact, there was not a liquidation, but a reorganization of the state body through the merger of territorial offices into the South-Western Interregional Office of the State Labor Service.
2. According to the law, during reorganization, the employer is obligated to offer the civil servant another equivalent or lower position, which was not done in this case.
3. The courts of previous instances incorrectly applied the norms of substantive law, considering that the liquidation of the state body had occurred.
Court Decision: To cancel previous court decisions and refer the case for a new review to the court of first instance to establish all circumstances of the case.
