Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Case No. 380/6549/24 dated 01/04/2025

Here is the translation:

1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging a tax notification-decision on imposing a penalty for late registration of tax invoices.

2. Key Court Arguments:

– The Supreme Court essentially changed previous practice regarding penalty sanctions for late registration of tax invoices.

– The period from March 2020 to May 2022 had a moratorium on penalty sanctions due to quarantine
– Legislation did not create clear conditions for taxpayers regarding invoice registration
– The rule of law principle requires an equal approach to all taxpayers
– It is necessary to consider the taxpayer’s ability to fulfill their obligations

3. Court Decision: Cancel previous court decisions and refer the case for a new review to thoroughly examine the circumstances.

Key Thesis: The court essentially sided with the taxpayer, pointing out the unfairness of the existing penalty mechanism.

Full text by link

Leave a comment

E-mail
Password
Confirm Password
Lexcovery
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.