Here is the translation of the legal analysis:
1. Subject of Dispute: Recognition of the SBU Department’s inaction as unlawful regarding improper consideration of a serviceman’s application for housing monetary compensation.
2. Main Court Arguments:
– Legislation provides servicemen with the right to receive housing or compensation for it
– There is a clear compensation procedure that includes a queue and review by the housing commission
– The respondent violated the procedure by not forwarding the application to the housing commission and not following the established procedure
– Queue order is a determining condition for receiving compensation
3. Court Decision: Partially satisfy the claim by obliging the SBU Department to review the plaintiff’s application through the housing commission in accordance with the established procedure.
Note: The court deviates from its previous position regarding interpretation of grounds for compensation refusal, emphasizing the fundamental importance of queue order compliance.
