Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Case No. 460/9136/23 dated 10/03/2025

Here is the translation:

1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging the refusal of the Urban Planning and Architecture Department to extend the temporary structure placement passport for entrepreneurial activity.

2. Main Court Arguments:
– The temporary structure placement passport is not a permit-type document, therefore the Cabinet of Ministers Resolution #314 on automatic document extension during martial law does not apply to it.
– The placement passport’s validity period had already expired at the time of the plaintiff’s appeal (11.10.2022), therefore the respondent lawfully refused extension.
– Previous instance courts incorrectly qualified the placement passport as a permit document.

3. Court Decision: Previous instance decisions were cancelled and the individual entrepreneur’s claim for passport extension was denied.

Note: The Supreme Court deviated from previous judicial practice regarding the interpretation of the concept of “permit-type document”.

Full text by link

Leave a comment

E-mail
Password
Confirm Password