Subject of Dispute: Challenging the State Executor’s Resolution on Terminating Enforcement Proceedings Regarding Determining the Father’s Method of Participation in Child Upbringing.
Main Arguments of the Court:
1. The court considers that the state executor approached the execution of the court decision on the father’s visitation with children formally.
2. Despite the absence of direct obstacles from the mother, the children consistently refuse to communicate with the father.
3. The state executor did not take sufficient measures to establish relations between the father and children, in particular, did not involve a psychologist and the child services.
Court Decision: To leave the appellate court resolution unchanged, which cancels the state executor’s decision on terminating the enforcement proceedings.
