Here is the translation:
1. Subject of Dispute: The Prosecutor’s Office attempted to compel the Education Department of the Irpin City Council through court to bring the civil protection shelter into proper condition.
2. Key Court Arguments:
– A prosecutor can represent state interests in court only if the authority does not exercise or improperly exercises interest protection
– The State Emergency Service (SES) does not have direct legislative powers to independently file lawsuits regarding bringing protective structures into proper condition
– Legislative changes did not provide the SES with a clear right to judicial appeal
3. Court Decision: To leave the prosecutor’s cassation complaint unsatisfied, previous court decisions unchanged.
Note: The court deviated from the previous legal position of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court from 2019 regarding the possibility of prosecutorial representation in SES cases.
