Subject of the Dispute: Prosecutor’s appeal against a court decision on releasing a person from serving a suspended sentence for evading conscription during mobilization.
Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court supported the decisions of previous instances, considering that the suspension of punishment is justified by several factors – the person works at critical infrastructure (coal enterprise), has no previous criminal record, has a minor child, the probation authority assessed the risks as moderate, and also taking into account the importance of economic support for the state during martial law.
Court Decision: To leave the previous court decisions unchanged and to reject the prosecutor’s cassation appeal.
