The court was guided by the fact that after amendments to the legislation in February 2022, preferential service years can only be taken into account for determining the pension amount, but not for its assignment. For pension assignment, a calendar service of 25 years is specifically required, which the plaintiff did not have (had only 22 years 8 months). The court also noted that the legislation in effect at the time of the person’s application for pension assignment, and not at the time of dismissal from service, should be applied.
Leave a comment
