The court of first instance left the lawsuit without consideration due to the repeated absence of the plaintiff or his representative at court hearings. However, the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court found that the plaintiff did not intend to delay the process and wished to defend his rights in court. The plaintiff’s representative submitted requests for the case to be considered without their participation but later requested to postpone the hearings to familiarize themselves with the case materials, which contained classified information. The court recognized that the plaintiff did not have an objective opportunity to review the materials due to martial law and other valid reasons.
The Grand Chamber overturned the decision of the court of first instance and remanded the case for a new hearing. Thus, the court upheld INDIVIDUAL_1’s right to a
