Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Ваш AI помічникНовий чат
    Open chat icon

    Review of the EU legislation for 12/03/2026

    “`html

    Here’s a breakdown of the EU legal acts you’ve provided:

    Review of each of legal acts published today:

    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/538 of 11 March 2026 concerning the authorisation of xanthan gum produced with Xanthomonas campestris ATCC SD 7012 or DSM 23730 or CNCM I-4861 or CIP 74.23 as a feed additive for all animal species other than cats, dogs and aquatic species


    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/528 of 11 March 2026 concerning the authorisation of patchouli essential oil from Pogostemon cablin Benth. as a feed additive for all animal species


    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/545 of 5 March 2026 on the registration of the geographical indication Adana Şalgamı (PGI) in the Union register of geographical indications pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2024/1143 of the European Parliament and of the Council


    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/525 of 11 March 2026 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2834 as regards fixing representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin


    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/540 of 11 March 2026 concerning the authorisation of acacia gum as a feed additive for all animal species


    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/534 of 11 March 2026 concerning the authorisation of a preparation of Duddingtonia flagrans NCIMB 30336 as a feed additive for grazing animals of bovine, ovine and caprine species other than for milk production, and for grazing animals of camelids, cervids, equines, porcine species and rabbits (holder of authorisation: International Animal Health Products Pty Ltd, represented in the Union by SynTech Regulatory Europe GmbH)


    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/532 of 11 March 2026 concerning the renewal of the authorisation and the authorisation of new uses of a preparation of monensin sodium (Coxidin) as a feed additive for chickens for fattening, chickens reared for laying, turkeys for fattening and turkeys reared for reproduction (holder of authorisation: Huvepharma N.V.) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 109/2007 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 140/2012


    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/524 of 11 March 2026 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2834 as regards fixing representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1988 as regards the administration of import tariff quotas in accordance with the first come, first served principle, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1484/95


    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/519 of 10 March 2026 amending the implementing technical standards laid down in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/622 as regards the frequency of reporting and the information to be reported


    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/530 of 10 March 2026 on exceptional support measures for the sheepmeat and pigmeat sectors in Hungary


    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/568 of 10 March 2026 amending and correcting Annexes I and II to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/594 laying down special disease control measures for African swine fever


    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/516 of 10 March 2026 correcting Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1403 as regards thujones concentration in Spanish sage essential oil


    Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 11 mars 2026.#Super Brand Licencing (SBG) contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque de l’Union européenne figurative GEOGRAPHICAL NORWAY EXPEDITION – Cause de nullité absolue – Mauvaise foi – Article 52, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 207/2009.#Affaire T-303/25.


    Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 11 mars 2026.#Friedrich Erlbacher contre Commission européenne.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Avis de vacance – Poste de directeur – Rejet de candidature – Acte faisant grief – Recevabilité – Incompétence de l’auteur de l’acte – Critères d’éligibilité – Notion de “fonction d’encadrement intermédiaire” – Erreur de droit.#Affaire T-195/25.


    Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 March 2026.Kiss Nail Products, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark IMPRESS – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration.Case T-326/25.


    Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 11 mars 2026.#QI contre Commission européenne.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Harcèlement moral – Article 12 bis du statut – Demande d’assistance – Article 24 du statut – Rejet de la demande – Faits nouveaux et substantiels pouvant justifier la présentation d’une demande tendant au réexamen d’une décision antérieure – Commencement de preuve du harcèlement moral allégué – Responsabilité.#Affaire T-6/25.


    Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 March 2026.Dariusz Kowalski v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark FLAMBIT – Earlier national word mark flambriks – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.Case T-301/25.


    Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 11 mars 2026.#Weight Doctors GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne verbale Endo-Sleeve – Motif absolu de refus – Caractère descriptif – Absence de caractère distinctif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b) et c), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001.#Affaire T-55/25.


    Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 March 2026.Shenzen Smoore Technology Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark V VENILO – Earlier EU figurative mark V – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Earlier mark’s lack of enhanced distinctiveness acquired through use – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.Case T-62/25.


    Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 March 2026.Mostostal S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark MOSTOSTAL – No genuine use of the trade mark – No proper reasons for non-use – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.Case T-663/24.


    Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 March 2026.MAX magazín s. r. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark MAX – Genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.Case T-114/25.


    Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 11 mars 2026.#Daniel Puppan contre Parlement européen.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Notation – Exercice de notation 2023 – Rapport de notation – Recours en annulation – Délai de recours – Irrecevabilité – Promotion – Exercice de promotion 2023 – Attribution de points de mérite – Obligation de motivation – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Responsabilité.#Affaire T-7/25.


    EFTA Surveillance Authority communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation 1008/2008 of the European parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community – Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations


    State aid – Decision to raise no objections


    Judgment of the Court of 28 November 2025 in Case E-8/25 – Aréas Dommages v Gable Insurance AG in Konkurs (Directive 2009/138/EC (Solvency II) – Article 268(1)(g) – Article 275(1) – Insurance claims – Privileged status – Statutory subrogation – National insolvency proceedings)


    State aid – Decision to raise no objections


    Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Reykjavik District Court dated 4 November 2025 in the case of AE and YM v The Icelandic State and Registers Iceland (Case E-25/25)


    State aid – Decision to raise no objections


    Decision of the Standing Committee of the EFTA States No. 5/2025/SC of 23 October 2025 on the resetting of the systemic risk buffer pursuant to Article 133 and the Norwegian notification of the setting of an O-SII buffer pursuant to Article 131 of Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions, as incorporated into the EEA Agreement by Joint Committee Decision No 79/2019 and later amendments [2026/555]

    E-mail
    Password
    Confirm Password
    Lexcovery
    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.