Here is the translation:
1. Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of the decision of the general meeting of members of the “Pivnich” auto garage cooperative from series No. 9 regarding delegation of an authorized member.
2. Main Arguments of the Court:
– Plaintiffs believed that the meeting was conducted with procedural violations: without proper notification and without a quorum
– The Supreme Court established that invalidating the decision on delegation of an authorized member would not restore the plaintiffs’ rights
– The court concluded that the method of protection chosen by the plaintiffs is ineffective, as it would not lead to actual restoration of their rights
3. Court Decision: Deny the satisfaction of the claim, leave the first instance court decision unchanged.
Note: The court deviated from previous practice regarding assessment of the effectiveness of corporate rights protection methods.
