Here is the translation:
1. Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of Assignment of Claims under Credit and Mortgage Agreements and Reclamation of Real Estate.
2. Key Court Arguments:
– The court confirmed the legal position of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court that assignment of claims under a credit agreement in favor of a natural person does not contradict legislation.
– The plaintiff is not a party to the credit agreement and cannot challenge its terms.
– Assignment agreements do not violate the plaintiff’s rights and interests.
– The credit agreement is not a consumer agreement, therefore special rules on consumer protection do not apply.
3. Court Decision: Reject the claim for invalidation of agreements and reclamation of property.
Additionally, the court canceled the decision on recovery of court expenses due to procedural violations in its adoption.
