Here is the translation:
1. Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of a land plot purchase and sale agreement, which was concluded by the plaintiff’s representative in her favor.
2. Main Arguments of the Court:
– The mere fact of family ties between the representative and the buyer is not grounds for declaring the contract invalid
– The representative acted within the scope of the power of attorney granted to her
– There is no evidence of malicious collusion between the representative and the buyer
– Non-receipt of funds is not a basis for declaring the contract invalid
3. Court Decision: Reject the claim to declare the land plot purchase and sale agreement invalid.
: The Supreme Court deviated from previous judicial practice, indicating that family ties in themselves do not evidence malicious collusion.
