Subject of Dispute: Cassation appeal of the verdict against PERSON_7, convicted of serious violent crimes, including robbery, unlawful deprivation of liberty, and extortion, with challenging the imposed property confiscation.
Main Arguments of the Court:
1. The court recognized that confiscation of all property may violate the rights of other family members living in the house.
2. It was established that the house was purchased by the convict’s father in 2000, when the convict was 7 years old.
3. Nine people are registered and living in the house, including a disabled mother, a disabled sister, and minor children.
Court Decision: The court partially satisfied the cassation appeal and modified the verdict, excluding the confiscation of housing, while leaving the rest of the punishment unchanged.
